Friday, May 22, 2020

सर्ग 2 / Canto II

I am Sita, Janaka-Nandini-Janaki, the doting daughter

of my father, king Janaka. I am born in a furrow from

mother earth in the sanctified sacrificial grounds.

 

I am utterly and unquestioningly in love.

I am the resolute, acquiescent,

enthralling wife of Lord Rama ; I am here

 

to keep the reserve of the prevalent onuses of a patriarchal

universe. Sitayah charitam mahat : this

tiara of a reverberant and talismanic phrase

 

they have put as my crown. My three sisters,

Urmila, Mandavi and Srutakriti married to

Rama's brothers, Lakshmana, Bharata and Satrughna.

 

May I call this 'sisterhood'? Their destinies

are as complex as mine, but half-as-eventful.

I am entwined by many a women of substance:

 

Anasuya, Sage Atri's wife; and then, my

concords with the legendary Gargi, Maitreyi,

Katyayani, Arundhati, Lopamudra, Ahalya.

 

Then the Rakshasa and Vanara queens,

Mandodari and Tara. It's a women's world. Female -bonding.

The tales of incredible exoneration and extraction.

 

My story is empirical — you may revolutionize

or rationalize its ingredients. Ravana, my abductor,

was ten-headed ! Hanuman, my

devotee, could wax or wan in size ;

Kumbhakarna was a gargantuan demon

in a prolonged slumber. Rama built

 

a bridge over the sea to reach me. Don't

ask, "is it possible ?" Don't question the

uncanny exploits. Don't raise eyebrows.

 

What is momentous in my story is the

Sita-ness of Sita, the pativrata,

the holy, fair and chaste woman, and

 

the force and grace that emanates from

my character with equivalent rationalization ,

in spite of the seeming metamorphoses.

 

I have seen many lives in one life.

Necromancy, the blackest of all the black arts,

played a trick in my epic action. The

 

magic deer, the Maya Sita, the demons,

 the snake-darts. But necromancy has

never been the ultimate factor in my hurt, indignant fate.

 

 

It is„ rather, the love and the chastisement, which

have time and again pushed me to square-one.

In my epic recital, the essential apprehension

 

is to fathom Rama, my humane husband, my lord.

The rest add up to the elements of the

invisible wrenches of prudence and to the

 

dynamics of my free-will. Yes, I am Sita,

the willingly-exiled woman.

This is no archaism with a reckoning.

 

Nevertheless, the vagrant of the human mind,

the advance of knowledge and power,

of the empowerment of the ecofeminist, and above all the

 

dreaded prospect of technology effecting the human brain

ancient. There is my small little song that embraces the key to the castles of the spirit, and my creative schedules.

My epic, the center stage concert vis-a-vis

the flora and fauna, steadily discloses itself

before you, oh terrestrial and cosmic beings!

 

Oh men and women, oh trees, rocks, rivers, clouds,

the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars and the comets!

I am ageless, timeless, beneficent and compassionate.

 

 

 

I am a deathless goddess, ever alive in each woman

you encounter. My quintessential story, reverberating from

the traps of Earth -Mother, is no vain-claim !!

 

I designate my torment and wield my sovereignty

by retiring from Rama after he asks me to

take a second test of fire ; but I have completed

the full cycle of my professed duties of

daughterhood, wifehood and motherhood.

Beyond patriarchal manipulations and domestic blues.

 

My heartrending history momentously links the Rama-Ravana

stories.

In a hypothesis, I have the obligation to repeat

this immense and magnificent record, hence this poem.

 

  

 

II.

    

जनक-नंदिनी-जानकीमेरा नाम सीता

मैं इकलौती पुत्री, राजा जनक मेरे पिता  

यज्ञ-पूजिता पावन धरती मेरी माता ।

 

पूरी तरह निर्विवादित प्रिया

पक्के इरादों वाली संतोष हिया  

भगवान राम की सुंदर भार्या 

 

पितृसत्तात्मक समाज की प्रचलित धारा

बनी “सीताय चरितम् महत:”- का मुहावरा

और मेरे सिर का आकर्षक जेवर ।

 

 

उर्मिलामांडवी और श्रुतिकीर्ति-मेरी तीन बहन

जिनका हुआ पाणिग्रहण सम्पन्न

राम के भाई लक्ष्मणभरत और शत्रुघ्न ।

 

 

क्या मैं इसे 'बहिनापाकहूँया कुछ और कथन ?

उनकी नियति भी मेरे जितनी जटिल,लिए अधूरापन  

अनेक प्रभावशाली महिलाओं से हुए मेरे कथोपकथन :

 

ऋषि अत्रि की पत्नी अनसूया,

प्रसिद्ध गार्गीमैत्रेयी,

कात्यायनीअरुंधतिलोपामुद्राअहल्या ।

 

 फिर असुर और वानर रानी,

 मंदोदरी और तारा

 इन महिलाओं के दुनिया की कहानी ।

 

उन नारियों का बंधन

उनके अविश्वसनीय संस्मरण  

उनकी चमत्कारी कहानी-किस्सों के निष्कर्षण।

 

मेरी कहानी का आधार है अनुभव

शोध कर सकते हो तुम जब-तब

या दे सकते हैं अपने तार्किक विभव  

 

मेरा अपहरणकर्ता दस सिर वाला रावण  

लघिमा-गरिमा में सिद्धहस्त हनुमान

दीर्घ निद्रालु पेटू दानव कुम्भकर्ण ।  

 

राम-सेतु बना मेरे खातिर समुद्र के धरातल  

 "यह संभव है?" मत पूछना यह सवाल

 भौहें चढ़ाकर, निकालना मत मेरी नकल 

 

मेरी कहानी में जो भी है थोड़ा-बहुत कथानक

वह है सीता का सीधा-सादा सीतापन,

पवित्रनिष्पक्ष और सती महिला का वर्णन।   

 

मेरा अनुग्रह और चारित्रिक बल 

अलंकारिक तर्कों के बावजूद हुआ सफल

और किया जन-मानस का काया-पटल 

 

मैंने अपने जीवन में देखे अनेक जीवन,

काली-विद्या का घनघोर कालापन

जिससे हुआ मेरी महाकाव्यिक भूमिका में अधोपतन।

 

स्वर्ण-हिरण,  राक्षस, साँप-सँपेरे, माया सीता

काली-विद्या ने कभी नहीं पहुंचाया आघात  

और नहीं किया बुरे भाग्य को आमंत्रित ।

  

मगर प्यार और पवित्रता के नाम  

बार-बार धकेला गया मुझे चौराहे पर खुले-आम

मेरे महाकाव्यिक भूमिका को किया गया बदनाम ।

 

मेरे पति मेरे प्रभु  राम एक ओर   

बाकी अदृश्य गतिशील संघर्ष दूसरी ओर

तान रहे थे मेरे विवेक और स्वतंत्र इच्छा की डोर ।

 

 हांमैं सीता हूँ निरपराध

स्वेच्छा से निर्वासित नारी

बिना किसी अपवाद 

 

फिर भीमानव-मन का आवारापन,

ज्ञान-शक्ति का उर्ध्वीकरण ,

पर्यावरण-नारीवादियों का सशक्तिकरण ।

 

और सबसे महत्वपूर्ण मानव-मस्तिष्क 

प्रौद्योगिकी से होगा प्रदूषित

लगेगा उस पर खतरनाक कलंक

 

मेरा महाकाव्य है- मेरी आत्मा का द्वार और मेरे सर्जन का कुंजी-पटल  

मेरा महाकाव्य दर्शाता है- नाट्य-मंच बनाम वनस्पतियों और जीवों का संबंध अटल

धीरे-धीरे तुम्हारे सामने लाता है पार्थिव और ब्रह्मांडीय जगत-जंजाल !

 

पेड़-पौधे,नदी-नाले, आकाश-बादल, सूरजचाँदसितारे,धूमकेतु,नर-नारी !

मैं हूँ अमरकालजयीदयालु और हितकारी

मैं हूँ मृत्युहीन देवी हूँअधिवास मेरा प्रत्येक जीवित-नारी ।

 

 यह सत्य है, मैं भूमिजा,कैसे बताऊँ मेरी व्यथा ?

नहीं मिटा सकती थी अपनी संप्रभुता,

राम ने जब कहा,रचूँगा दूसरी अग्नि-परीक्षा की गाथा।  

 

तब तक निभा चुकी थी मैं पुत्रीपत्नी और माता के दायित्व,

सारे पारिवारिक कर्तव्य  

पितृसत्तात्मक जोड़-घटाव और घरेलू कलंक से परे निर्भय

 

मेरा हृदयस्पर्शी इतिहास हर पल याद दिलाता राम-रावण

मैं दोहराने को विवश हो जाती अपना परिकल्पन

इस कवितायन का अपूर्व शानदार वर्णन 

 


1 comment:


  1. krishna Gopal KulshreshthaAugust 19, 2025 at 7:07 AM
    Unique presentation of pain of Sita. Her character is holding high position in the heart of those who could have felt her pain but the number of such person is not much because of patriarchal mindset. In my opinion you have done full justice to Sita. Ram does not deserve to be called MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM RAM because he did not have MARYADA , His low standard behavior and attitude towards Sita put him not more than an ordinary PURUSH because he did what an ordinary man does towards his wife. His character goes very low when he called /ordered Sita to give her test of chastity second time to accept her as his wife. Sita did not want to repeat the same thing which was done in Lanka amid the presence of all the public only due to the whim of Ram. She had known that Ram has no love for her. He had only pride and prejudice towards her. She felt that she is only an object in the hand of her husband. Instead of going with Ram she thought it better to let him go without her. And she went in the lap of mother Earth. She had come from the lap of mother Earth. Ram returned to Ayodhya by taking LavandKush as his sons.
    Here the question arises on the character of Ram that he had suspected the chastity of Sita thinking that Sita remained in the forest for years and whether these sons are mine or not? But after death of Sita what made him to think that these sons are mine. What made him to think so?
    Sita lived her life only for few years but as per Valmiki Ramayan Ram remained on thrown for thousands of years.
    Any way I vow to you as a poet that you have brought down the realities of the character of Ram as an ordinary person not king not divine God. I think Valmiki portraited Ram 's real character while Tulsi Das put blanket on all the undivinely traits on the part of Ram.
    In my opinion the name of Valmiki Ramayan should have been SITAYAN. and the name of Tulsi Das Ramcharitmanas should have been SITACHARITMANAS and he should have been written Lav Kush Kand also but he very cleverly try to hide the undivinely traits on the part of Ram. Again my thanks to you for such an Epic

    ReplyDelete